A friend of which I always like books on her recommendation, lend me recently Hanna Poddings book "My instructions to the radical courage to be different." With the words: "Just excited to hear about the woman." Given that my friend the same time two years ago with the words "You do not like definitely" a book on the birthday gift (and she was right), I thought to myself, why nagut not upset sometimes about others? Well, the good was right again, I was excited.
I would not accuse the author of their non-existing style that makes it impossible to show in the described "action" into it to offset. The author is Publication of the book at 23 years old and is aiming to secure a career as a writer. It can be read at least an average 13 year old without the aid of a dictionary;. That's also something.
Rather upsets me the contents of the book and the arrogance and naivete on the author. Someone who honestly believes that the citizens of the FRG are uninformed, thus suggesting in this book can only be viewed as naive. Most described in the book "scandalous" content should any even semi-educated people are already known. Unfortunately, the author conveys the impression of her was not at all clear (maybe I'm doing it wrong?) And It is therefore imperative to inform.
I do not understand me wrong, I think demonstrations for an additional source of information. Thus, they have just as newspapers, blogs, magazines, television, etc. right to exist and will definitely contribute also to inform citizens, but they are not the only medium that is capable of. Ultimately, the purpose of the use of media for me to be fully informed and to me ultimately to form an opinion. It is useful to me opinions. Mrs. Poddig however do not really want that I form an opinion. She wants me to take over their minds. People who move out of the question that they are could be wrong and not in a position to accept opinions that contradict their own, give me nightmares.
latest on page 25 captures my heart messed landscape designers to scream loud and that, at this undifferentiated view. There will woman Poddig that affect wind power plants, the landscape and the people especially do not want to have on their doorstep. It therefore goes to the NIMBY phenomenon. It is here suggriert that all critics of wind power plants, do so only because they do not want their neighborhood real thing, (and of course that is bad, because wind turbines are great ecological and so). This is of course not Sun The Regional Planning Program 2005 of Hanover defined in addition to the distances from wind turbines to residential areas, various other distances:
priority areas for open space functions and priority areas for nature and landscape (. Habitats, Natura 2000, NSG, Gepl NSG): 200 to 500 m
screening areas for nature and landscape (.. LSG, Gepl LSG, avifaunistic valuable range according NLÖ) are subject to individual assessment
Vorrang-/Vorsorgegebiet for recreation, raw material extraction, screening areas for forestry (forest): 200 m
Furthermore, there may be increased bat and bird strike numbers by wind turbines, cases where they lie in the direction of pull of the animals. In addition, there may be avoidance behavior of the animals come, that resident birds and bats to avoid the vicinity of wind turbines.
woman is either uninformed or they would like to Poddig szenieren an ideal which do not. Certainly, the wind energy is an important renewable energy source, but no way to consider only positive, but for good reasons in each case subject to an individual assessment.
Another point of bothers me about this book is the lack of identified alternatives. A woman is demanding the complete abolition of the penal system must present alternatives. To support their argument, they will have two people, for break-ins without personal injury, to sit in jail. This may be found unfair, but perhaps in this case are the laws too tough? Perhaps we should revise selbige? No, it's better every schienbar criminals .... So what really? Unfortunately, the reader is woman Poddig their model on the rehabilitation guilty (perhaps people should not be rehabilitated?). I have no idea because the book only punishes the criminal justice as such, but at this point to stop already. I would be interested simply imagine how the author dealing with a crime in the future, which would probably (at least at a more competent writer) more interesting can be.
Unfortunately, this superficiality extends throughout the book. Those who do not think like the author not know their ideas for social change is lacking any differentiation.
Yes, Madam Poddig me is really unappealing and annoying me.
0 comments:
Post a Comment